This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our Advertising Disclosure, visit this page.

If you subscribe to my newsletter or listen to me on the radio and TV, then you know I’m always touting fast-track trusted traveler programs as one of the best things to ever happen to travel. My family and I all have Global Entry, NEXUS, TSA PreCheck and Clear. RELATED: The trick to getting TSA PreCheck fast And 4 other tips you need to know

Clear is a private biometrics company that partnered with the US government to use your eyes and face as your touchless ID so you can bypass those long, slow security lines at over 55 U.S. airports, as well as some sports and entertainment venues (here’s a list; make sure you check not only the airport but terminal, too) by quickly scanning your irises and ticket.

However, one of the problems with Clear is that the secret is out and the lines are sometimes longer than TSA PreCheck so I end up just bypassing it. Unfortunately, there are some airport terminals, ahem LAX’s T4 (pictured above), where the Clear check-in is downstairs and the security line is upstairs so you don’t know which line is longer.

I was recently flying from Nashville International Airport and I arrived at 6am for my 7:30am flight. I was shocked at how long the Clear line was. I was even more surprised by how short the TSA PreCheck line was and you could easily see it from the Clear line (see photo above and look to the right for the TSA Pre line).

So if you want to save time and there’s a line at Clear, then just check the security lines before waiting for Clear.

Now, I’m aware of the news that a new bill (SB-1372) could ban Clear from operating at California airports. According to CBS News, “Sen. Josh Newman, a California Democrat and the sponsor of the legislation, said Clear effectively lets wealthier people skip in front of passengers who have been waiting to be screened by Transportation Security Administration agents.”

The bill “has bipartisan support from Republican Sen. Janet Nguyen. The Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA) also supports the bill, as does the union representing Transportation Security Officers in Oakland, Sacramento, and San Jose.”

I don’t think it’s all that bad news because the bill doesn’t seek to prohibit Clear from operating in California airports. It’s just going to force Clear into creating their own dedicated security lines separate from other passengers, which makes sense.

KEEP READING: How travelers can beat the Global Entry and NEXUS price hike

Want more travel news, tips and deals? Sign up to Johnny Jet’s free newsletter and check out these popular posts: The Travel Gadget Flight Attendants Never Leave Home Without and 12 Ways to Save Money on Baggage Fees. Follow Johnny Jet on MSNFacebook, InstagramPinterest, and YouTube for all of my travel posts.

1 Comment On "My Clear strategy and why I'm not worried about the new California bill to ban it"
  1. AJ|

    I have to say I was expecting a bit more from this article based on the headline. It was basically one sentence about how you’re not worried about the proposed legislation, which was already in the headline…I thought there was going to be some insight, perhaps ramifications for Clear on their business model, whether or not it’s feasible or likely that they’d comply, if that might impact Clear fees or their ability to continue operating in airports, etc.

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *